- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:17:53 +0000
- To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 24 Jan 2012, at 18:07, David McNeil wrote: > * Step 5.3 - "For each IRI class..." - I think the word "IRI" here is un-necessary and potentially confusing. I would strike it. > > * Step 6.5.8 - "For each IRI predicate..." - I think the word "IRI" here is un-necessary and potentially confusing. I would strike it. Ok, struck “IRI” in both. > * "Target graphs, a set of zero or more IRIs" - To my reading of the steps, the target graph is either a single IRI (i.e. rr:defaultGraph) or a set of IRIs. I don't think it is ever a set of size zero. Futhermore, I think the steps above need to be changed to produce singleton sets of rr:defaultGraph. No, there can be zero graphs if there was a graph map but it didn't produce any values because of NULLs. Best, Richard
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 18:18:32 UTC