Re: Proposal to raise awareness around our RBB2RDF work

Yes, that could work, but I think some blogs, for example, would be welcome, too. As the CR publication happens next week, people should talk about it in various fora and mailing lists; something that we have not really done.

Ivan

On Feb 16, 2012, at 07:38 , Michael Hausenblas wrote:

> 
> All,
> 
> So far I was under the naive impression that our RDB2RDF work is *somewhat* widely know. Well, I was taught a tough lesson that this is not the case, as it seems [1]. I propose, in order to address the awareness issue around RDB2RDF in general and to inform about the upcoming RDB2RDF standards, that we hold, starting with 02/3012, regular, maybe weekly, 'RDB2RDF team' question times. This could for example take place via Google+ hangouts, where people can chime in and discuss with WG members, ask questions and where we can ideally also gather implementation feedback.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
> 
> [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9283567/create-rdf-using-defined-owl-ontology
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 08:31:02 UTC