- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:33:23 +0100
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Cc: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <BDCA9D3E-A67B-4005-B780-B0EE80813158@w3.org>
Yes, that could work, but I think some blogs, for example, would be welcome, too. As the CR publication happens next week, people should talk about it in various fora and mailing lists; something that we have not really done. Ivan On Feb 16, 2012, at 07:38 , Michael Hausenblas wrote: > > All, > > So far I was under the naive impression that our RDB2RDF work is *somewhat* widely know. Well, I was taught a tough lesson that this is not the case, as it seems [1]. I propose, in order to address the awareness issue around RDB2RDF in general and to inform about the upcoming RDB2RDF standards, that we hold, starting with 02/3012, regular, maybe weekly, 'RDB2RDF team' question times. This could for example take place via Google+ hangouts, where people can chime in and discuss with WG members, ask questions and where we can ideally also gather implementation feedback. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9283567/create-rdf-using-defined-owl-ontology > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel. +353 91 495730 > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ > http://sw-app.org/about.html > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 08:31:02 UTC