- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:02:58 -0800
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Yes, Michael, that is a good idea. But as Ivan said, we should try other kinds of outreach as well - blogs, conference papers and, best of all, success stories - I had this problem and was able to solve it using RDB2RDF. All the best, Ashok On 2/15/2012 10:38 PM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > > All, > > So far I was under the naive impression that our RDB2RDF work is *somewhat* widely know. Well, I was taught a tough lesson that this is not the case, as it seems [1]. I propose, in order to address the awareness issue around RDB2RDF in general and to inform about the upcoming RDB2RDF standards, that we hold, starting with 02/3012, regular, maybe weekly, 'RDB2RDF team' question times. This could for example take place via Google+ hangouts, where people can chime in and discuss with WG members, ask questions and where we can ideally also gather implementation feedback. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9283567/create-rdf-using-defined-owl-ontology > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel. +353 91 495730 > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ > http://sw-app.org/about.html > >
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 14:02:30 UTC