- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 00:33:37 -0400
- To: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Cc: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
* Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2012-08-01 16:54-0700] > Thank you, Boris! This is great! > > Richard, Eric: > Can you update the SOTD in your documents with the URL for the implementation report? done. > And the R2RML needs to update a reference to the Implementation report. > I think that is all we need. > All the best, Ashok > > On 8/1/2012 4:46 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > >Hi Richard > > > >Thank you very much for taking care of this. > > > >I updated both documents with your comments. > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/ > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/ > > > >Please let me know if there are more issues to solve. > > > >Thanks again > > > >Boris > > > > > >On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > > > >>Boris, Michael, > >> > >>My understanding is that TC and ImplRep will be published as W3C Notes. This means they get both timestamped URLs and permalinks in the http://www.w3.org/TR/ space. > >> > >>I understand that these are the latest candidate documents: > >> > >>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/ > >>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/ > >> > >>I reviewed both from a W3C style point of view and they still need quite a few changes! A list is below. > >> > >>(I can help make those changes tomorrow morning if necessary.) > >> > >>Best, > >>Richard > >> > >> > >>1. Date of publication needs to be changed to 14 August 2012 > >> > >>2. “This version” needs to point to correct timestamped URL *in TR space* > >> > >>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-test-cases/ > >>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-implementations/ > >> > >>3. “Latest version” needs to point to untimestamped shortname *in TR space* > >> > >>• http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-test-cases-20120814/ > >>• http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-implementations-20120814/ > >> > >>4. SotD needs to be for a NOTE, not for an ED. I'm not sure what exactly the SotD should say, but I guess you can use these as rough templates: > >> > >>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/ > >>• http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ > >> > >>5. References in the ImplRep need to use URLs in TR space with correct date, timestamp, and without “work in progress” markers. > >> > >>6. Many URLs in the body of both documents need to be updated from ED or from old WD/CR to latest PR URLs (or alrernatively to untimestamped shortname URL in TR space). This includes all the spec references in the TC, and all the TC links in the ImplRep. > >> > >>7. TC Section 4 contains a messed-up link to "Section 10 of the R2RML specification"; I guess the intended target URL is http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#note-natural-mapping-extensions > >> > >>8. ImplRep Section 4 (References) contains a messed-up reference for [RDB2RDF TC], there is some stuff about RDFa in there!? > >> > >>9. ImplRep calls it once [Direct Mapping] and then [DM] > >> > >>10. ImplRep defines a ref for [RDB2RDF-WG] that is never used, delete! > > -- -ericP
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 04:34:09 UTC