- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 00:34:19 -0400
- To: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
* Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2012-08-01 17:41-0700] > Ok. Great! So, we are now waiting for Eric to fix the reference to the Implementation Report > in the DM SOTD. done. > Thank you Richard and Boris for your late night work! > All the best, Ashok > > On 8/1/2012 5:32 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >On 2 Aug 2012, at 00:54, Ashok Malhotra wrote: > >>Richard, Eric: > >>Can you update the SOTD in your documents with the URL for the implementation report? > >Done for R2RML. > > > >Would have quickly done it for the DM too, but Eric's latest version is not in CVS, so I can't help here. > > > >>And the R2RML needs to update a reference to the Implementation report. > >Right, forgot that one. Now fixed. > > > >The URL is still > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/PR-r2rml-20120814/ > > > >And I believe it's good to go. > > > >Once the implementation report URL in the DM is fixed, and someone (Ivan?) confirms that the SotD on the two NOTEs [1][2] is fine, then we should be all done AFAICT. > > > >All the best, > >Richard > > > > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/ > >[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/ > > > > > > > >>I think that is all we need. > >>All the best, Ashok > >> > >>On 8/1/2012 4:46 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > >>>Hi Richard > >>> > >>>Thank you very much for taking care of this. > >>> > >>>I updated both documents with your comments. > >>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/ > >>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/ > >>> > >>>Please let me know if there are more issues to solve. > >>> > >>>Thanks again > >>> > >>>Boris > >>> > >>> > >>>On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >>> > >>>>Boris, Michael, > >>>> > >>>>My understanding is that TC and ImplRep will be published as W3C Notes. This means they get both timestamped URLs and permalinks in the http://www.w3.org/TR/ space. > >>>> > >>>>I understand that these are the latest candidate documents: > >>>> > >>>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/ > >>>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/ > >>>> > >>>>I reviewed both from a W3C style point of view and they still need quite a few changes! A list is below. > >>>> > >>>>(I can help make those changes tomorrow morning if necessary.) > >>>> > >>>>Best, > >>>>Richard > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>1. Date of publication needs to be changed to 14 August 2012 > >>>> > >>>>2. “This version” needs to point to correct timestamped URL *in TR space* > >>>> > >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-test-cases/ > >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-implementations/ > >>>> > >>>>3. “Latest version” needs to point to untimestamped shortname *in TR space* > >>>> > >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-test-cases-20120814/ > >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-implementations-20120814/ > >>>> > >>>>4. SotD needs to be for a NOTE, not for an ED. I'm not sure what exactly the SotD should say, but I guess you can use these as rough templates: > >>>> > >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/ > >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ > >>>> > >>>>5. References in the ImplRep need to use URLs in TR space with correct date, timestamp, and without “work in progress” markers. > >>>> > >>>>6. Many URLs in the body of both documents need to be updated from ED or from old WD/CR to latest PR URLs (or alrernatively to untimestamped shortname URL in TR space). This includes all the spec references in the TC, and all the TC links in the ImplRep. > >>>> > >>>>7. TC Section 4 contains a messed-up link to "Section 10 of the R2RML specification"; I guess the intended target URL is http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#note-natural-mapping-extensions > >>>> > >>>>8. ImplRep Section 4 (References) contains a messed-up reference for [RDB2RDF TC], there is some stuff about RDFa in there!? > >>>> > >>>>9. ImplRep calls it once [Direct Mapping] and then [DM] > >>>> > >>>>10. ImplRep defines a ref for [RDB2RDF-WG] that is never used, delete! > > -- -ericP
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 04:34:50 UTC