- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:54:03 -0700
- To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5019C19B.7000308@oracle.com>
Thank you, Boris! This is great! Richard, Eric: Can you update the SOTD in your documents with the URL for the implementation report? And the R2RML needs to update a reference to the Implementation report. I think that is all we need. All the best, Ashok On 8/1/2012 4:46 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > Hi Richard > > Thank you very much for taking care of this. > > I updated both documents with your comments. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/ > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/ > > Please let me know if there are more issues to solve. > > Thanks again > > Boris > > > On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> Boris, Michael, >> >> My understanding is that TC and ImplRep will be published as W3C Notes. This means they get both timestamped URLs and permalinks in the http://www.w3.org/TR/ space. >> >> I understand that these are the latest candidate documents: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/ >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/ >> >> I reviewed both from a W3C style point of view and they still need quite a few changes! A list is below. >> >> (I can help make those changes tomorrow morning if necessary.) >> >> Best, >> Richard >> >> >> 1. Date of publication needs to be changed to 14 August 2012 >> >> 2. “This version” needs to point to correct timestamped URL *in TR space* >> >> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-test-cases/ >> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-implementations/ >> >> 3. “Latest version” needs to point to untimestamped shortname *in TR space* >> >> • http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-test-cases-20120814/ >> • http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-implementations-20120814/ >> >> 4. SotD needs to be for a NOTE, not for an ED. I'm not sure what exactly the SotD should say, but I guess you can use these as rough templates: >> >> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/ >> • http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ >> >> 5. References in the ImplRep need to use URLs in TR space with correct date, timestamp, and without “work in progress” markers. >> >> 6. Many URLs in the body of both documents need to be updated from ED or from old WD/CR to latest PR URLs (or alrernatively to untimestamped shortname URL in TR space). This includes all the spec references in the TC, and all the TC links in the ImplRep. >> >> 7. TC Section 4 contains a messed-up link to "Section 10 of the R2RML specification"; I guess the intended target URL is http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#note-natural-mapping-extensions >> >> 8. ImplRep Section 4 (References) contains a messed-up reference for [RDB2RDF TC], there is some stuff about RDFa in there!? >> >> 9. ImplRep calls it once [Direct Mapping] and then [DM] >> >> 10. ImplRep defines a ref for [RDB2RDF-WG] that is never used, delete! >
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 23:53:29 UTC