- From: Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:04:37 +0100
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
regrets for tomorrow telecon, another week with last minute lecture Boris On 21/11/2011 14:21, ashok malhotra wrote: > --------------------------------------------------------- > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-11-22 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > *17:00-18:00 UTC* > Local time: > http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11&day=15&year=2011&hour=17&min=00&sec=0 > > > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) > Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF") > IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > Chair: Ashok > Scribe: ? > > 1. Admin > > PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of F2F meeting > http://www.w3.org/2011/11/15-RDB2RDF-minutes.html > > 2. A few words about the CR process: Ivan > > 3. LC Issue 14: DM and R2RML should use same datatype mapping > We agreed on 11/15 that both specs will contain an informative note > re. user-defined > datatypes. The question of which canonical form to use is still open > Richard: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0047.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0048.html > Mariano Rodriguez: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0049.html > Joerg Unbehauen: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0051.html > > 4. Issue-72: Bring back R2RML lookup tables > New proposal from Richard: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/drafts/translation-tables-DERI2.html > > 5. Other open issues: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/open > > 6. AOB
Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 23:03:26 UTC