Re: Functions in R2RML

David:
As you can tell, I'm still thinking about this.

If the WG agrees we can say that for some usecases the user can write a function
that runs in his application after the mapping is done.  And say no more.
All the best, Ashok

On 11/4/2011 8:57 AM, David McNeil wrote:
> It seems to me that if the user refers to a function in an R2RML mapping, then the user expects that function to be executed as part of producing the output dataset. So I don't see how it would be useful to let them refer to a function in a mapping, but leave the user responsible for running it. Maybe I misunderstand you or maybe there is some use case I am not thinking of?
>
> -David

Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 16:09:58 UTC