Re: Functions in R2RML

It seems to me that if the user refers to a function in an R2RML mapping,
then the user expects that function to be executed as part of producing the
output dataset. So I don't see how it would be useful to let them refer to
a function in a mapping, but leave the user responsible for running it.
Maybe I misunderstand you or maybe there is some use case I am not thinking
of?

-David