Re: ISSUE-32 resolution implemented (rr:joinCondition)

I created the UML of R2RML reflecting changes form ISSUE-32. I did't update the diagram with respect to ISSUE-18 since I realized that this issue is still open.

Diagrams:
http://oegdev.dia.fi.upm.es/projects/rdb2rdf/R2RML.png
http://oegdev.dia.fi.upm.es/projects/rdb2rdf/refobjectmapclass.PNG

Regards,
 Alex


On 24/05/2011, at 21:21, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> I have changed the spec to reflect the ISSUE-32 resolution. This is ACTION-130. I'm closing the issue.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/32
> 
> This changes rr:joinCondition from a string with syntax such as "{childAlias.}deptno={parentAlias.}deptno", to a resource with properties rr:child and rr:parent, each of which is a column name. I also introduced a new class rr:Join for that resource, although this wouldn't be used explicitly most of the time. This has changed some cardinalities and stuff too.
> 
> Several of the UML and bubble/arrow diagrams require updating to reflect this.
> 
> The changes can be seen here:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#RefObjectMapClass_Class
> 
> For the record: The resolution was recorded around here:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/05/17-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item03
> 
> Best,
> Richard