- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:32:46 +0100
- To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Cc: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
David, > For what it's worth, we here at Revelytix are using SPARQL 1.1 with > R2RML. We specifically need features like aggregates and federation. Good to know, indeed (sort of relieving to hear that there is a path)! However, IIRC we agreed to focus our *current* work on SPARQL 1.0 (I should really dig out the resolution ;), which certainly does not mean that for a R2RML 2.0 we can't take this into account. I'm all for applying Okkam's razor here. Let's not try to boil the ocean for now but create a solution that 1. solves the problem at hand, and 2. doesn't bite us in the back when we want to go for a future version of SPARQL or a newer version of SQL, FWIW. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 18 May 2011, at 14:27, David McNeil wrote: > For what it's worth, we here at Revelytix are using SPARQL 1.1 with > R2RML. We specifically need features like aggregates and federation. > > -David
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 13:33:27 UTC