Re: Q: ISSUE-41 bNode semantics from David McNeil on 2011-05-18 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from May 2011)

From: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:27:46 -0500
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Cc: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BANLkTinUrdYZLSmSwbfe56U3DXi9rW=2QA@mail.gmail.com>

For what it's worth, we here at Revelytix are using SPARQL 1.1 with R2RML.
We specifically need features like aggregates and federation.

-David

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 13:28:13 UTC