- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:51:05 +0100
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
I have to send regrets for today. My ACTION-123 continues. If any of these proposals that were posted on the mailing list in the past week are put to the vote, please count me +1: [[ PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-20, ISSUE-28, ISSUE-32 and ISSUE-44 as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0136.html ]] [[ PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-36 as POSTPONED. The initial version of R2RML will not provide special features for creating schema triples. ]] [[ PROPOSAL: The WG decides that Turtle is the single normative syntax for R2RML. ]] Best, Richard On 28 Jun 2011, at 12:35, ashok malhotra wrote: > --------------------------------------------------------- > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-06-28 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > *16:00-17:00 UTC* > Local time: > http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=05&day=10&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0 > > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) > Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF") > IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Chair: Ashok > > 1. Selection of scribe > > 2. Admin > - PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/06/21-rdb2rdf-minutes.html > - PROPOSAL: Cancel July 4 Telcon > > 3. Question about DM Implementations > > 4. Open Issues > Discuss open issues: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/open > - Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0139.html > - ISSUE 46: Property names > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0131.html > - ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0111.html > - ISSUE-47 (ivalid-iris): What happens when rr:column, rr:template, etc produce invalid IRIs? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0132.html > - ISSUE 22: SQL Identifiers > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0119.html > - Postpone ISSUE 36: "Terminology-level" triples as part of R2RML mapping output > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/36 > - ISSUE 37: DB Connection details in R2RML > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/37 > > 5. Test Cases > Test Case for ISSUE 42 Boris > > 6. AOB > -- > All the best, Ashok >
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 13:51:35 UTC