- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:41:43 -0400
- To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
* David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com> [2011-06-22 08:00-0500] > > Personally, I'd really prefer not to go there, and just not deliver on the > > “SHOULD have XML representation” goal in the charter. Having a single > > normative syntax is best. > > > > Richard - You make a compelling case. Thanks for discussing this. We could make it abundantly clear that we are just going through the motions: Content-Type: application/xml-for-xml's-sake+xml <root> @prefix rr: <http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml#> . @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . … <#TriplesMap1> a rr:TriplesMapClass; rr:SQLQuery """ Select Concat('Department', "deptno") AS "deptId" , "deptno" , "dname" , "loc" from SCOTT.DEPT where depto > 1000 """; … </#TriplesMap1> </root> > -David -- -ericP
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 19:42:14 UTC