Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes?

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>wrote:

> That is true. So why are you so concerned about the RDF serialization
> format that's being used?
>
>
Hmm... actually I am not concerned, that is the point :)


> You have not actually presented any argument why you are opposed to
> requiring Turtle support in conforming implementations.
>

Well, I have tried to but it seems I have not succeeded :(

-David