- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:34:25 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
>> >> context see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0101.html > > I'm afraid I don't understand. How does ISSUE-29 relate to that > message? I asked Ivan and others, incl. you. This is the answer I got. > I would appreciate if in the very near future, the chairs would also > allocate some meeting time for housekeeping: Point taken. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 21 Jun 2011, at 12:22, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 21 Jun 2011, at 09:09, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> 2. ISSUE-29 >> >> PROPOSAL: Change to OPEN >> >> context see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0101.html > > I'm afraid I don't understand. How does ISSUE-29 relate to that > message? > >> 3. Review of open actions/issues >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/open >> >> Please prepare. The goal is to close as many actions as possible >> and assign actions to issues where not done yet. > > I would appreciate if in the very near future, the chairs would also > allocate some meeting time for housekeeping: > > - close issues and actions marked as PENDING REVIEW > - transition issues marked as RAISED to OPEN > - deal with obsolete open ACTIONs -- our oldest open action just > passed its first birthday > > The trackers are useless if they don't reflect current reality. > > Cheers, > Richard
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 11:34:54 UTC