Re: The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to be supported

Enrico,

> This set to be supported SHOULD be as complete as possible and be  
> defined as soon as possible after the WG official launch.

Is the important part. And I think we have a resolution on this now. I  
personally wouldn't worry about this but I'm happy to take a rewording  
on board. Tracker this is my ACTION-117.

Can you please propose a concrete wording for the charter update?


Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 21 Jun 2011, at 09:59, Enrico Franconi wrote:

> Folks, I reread the charter today, and the first two bullets are:
>
> • The mapping language MUST define the mapping of relational data  
> and relational schemas to RDF and OWL.
>
> • The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to  
> be supported in the first release. This set to be supported SHOULD  
> be as complete as possible and be defined as soon as possible after  
> the WG official launch.
>
> How does the latter "MUST" relate to our discussion on NULL values?  
> Can we map relational data with NULL values and at the same time can  
> we not provide support on how to properly access this data in RDF?
> --e.

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 09:53:32 UTC