- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:58:17 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> I am not sure this has an effect on R2RML or DM; possibly not. But > you may want to know about that anyway! Thanks. Scanned our issues and didn't find anything matching - maybe someone else has an idea? However, we have a 'pending review' issue (ISSUE-29) which, I *think* can be re-opened now based on [1]. Ivan/Richard/Souri - whoever is also in the RDF WG, can you confirm this please? Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Skolemisation -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 16 Jun 2011, at 08:36, Ivan Herman wrote: > I am not sure this has an effect on R2RML or DM; possibly not. But > you may want to know about that anyway! > > Ivan > > Begin forwarded message: > >> Resent-From: public-rdf-wg@w3.org >> From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> >> Date: June 15, 2011 18:39:19 GMT+02:00 >> To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk >> >, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> >> Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, W3C SW CG Group <w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org >> >, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org >> Subject: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals >> message-id: <5F656216-FE45-426E-A93E-4E90DDC3BE3D@3roundstones.com> >> >> Hi all, >> >> The RDF working group resolved our ISSUE-12 [1] today, which is >> intended to "reconcile various forms of string literals". >> >> We resolved to accept the proposal at: >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/StringLiterals/ >> AbolishUntaggedPlain >> with the modification that preferred output form (SHOULD) is "foo" >> not "foo" ^^xsd:string in RDF; and we recommend that SPARQL and >> other WGs do the same. >> >> Discussion highlighted several possible areas of concern, which we >> believe the current proposal addresses. Specifically, it was noted >> that: >> >> - The forms "foo" and "foo"^^xsd:string are equivalent input >> syntaxes. >> - The form "foo" is the preferred output syntax. >> - The WG suggests retaining the term "plain literal" in documents >> to avoid unnecessary rework. Such plain literals would be >> considered semantically equivalent to xsd:strings. >> >> NB: This resolution makes *no statement* about language-tagged >> literals (e.g. "foo"@en). >> >> We invite discussion regarding the ramifications of this resolution >> to other working groups and implementors. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/12 >> >> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 07:58:47 UTC