- From: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:56:46 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 12:57:13 UTC
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > There is also an ugly administrative issue, actually. A standard (W3C or > otherwise, actually) should refer to standards only. It is somewhere in the > pubrules of W3C, too. Ie, while referring to an ISO standard is, of course, > perfectly all right, referring to a company specific, to-be-changed and > potentially-unstable document is not...:-( > Ivan - What document are you referring to as "company specific", etc? -David
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 12:57:13 UTC