Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL

> The thing is, implementers will know what to do anyways, it's just
> impossible for us to write it down normatively in the spec. We could add
> some handwaving text that explains the intuition of handling vendor-specific
> SQL in the appropriate way, but I don't see how that's any better than just
> saying, “We define R2RML for SQL 2008 Core, full stop. You use another
> dialect, it's up to you to figure out the details.”
>
> Can you think of some words that work better for you than the proposed
> ones?
>

Richard - I will try and spend some time thinking about this. Thank you for
the response.

-David