- From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:53:43 -0600
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Cc: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=n_B06s0OZTjAT+94-BeZB7Zx8XQ5x2=ZpVTLp@mail.gmail.com>
I'll organize the Issues today :) Juan Sequeda +1-575-SEQ-UEDA www.juansequeda.com On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Michael Hausenblas < michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote: > > > Michael, could you give a little protocol tutorial so we'd know what > > to stick in Subject lines, what to stick in message bodies, where > > threading matters or doesn't? > > I suggest people read http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/ - I think I'm not > able to describe it better. > > Note that my reminder was mainly for Juan - the discussion continues and we > still don't have an ISSUE for it :( > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel. +353 91 495730 > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ > http://sw-app.org/about.html > > > > > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> > > Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) - http://www.w3.org/ > > Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:28:37 -0500 > > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > > Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org> > > Subject: tracker protocol tutorial? > > > > (deliberately breaking thread) > > > > * Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> [2011-01-19 > 16:42+0000] > >> > >> With my chair hat on: I appreciate all your enthusiasm very much, but I > >> would appreciate it even more if this discussion would be done within > the > >> context of an issue. > > > > Michael, could you give a little protocol tutorial so we'd know what > > to stick in Subject lines, what to stick in message bodies, where > > threading matters or doesn't? > > > >> Tracker, this is ACTION-95 on Juan. > > > > For instance, did that link your message from an ACTION? Can we > > instead say something like ISSUE-nn to associate a thread with an > > issue? > > > > -- > > -ericP > >
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 12:54:48 UTC