- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:20:00 +0000
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Michael, could you give a little protocol tutorial so we'd know what > to stick in Subject lines, what to stick in message bodies, where > threading matters or doesn't? I suggest people read http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/ - I think I'm not able to describe it better. Note that my reminder was mainly for Juan - the discussion continues and we still don't have an ISSUE for it :( Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> > Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) - http://www.w3.org/ > Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:28:37 -0500 > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org> > Subject: tracker protocol tutorial? > > (deliberately breaking thread) > > * Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> [2011-01-19 16:42+0000] >> >> With my chair hat on: I appreciate all your enthusiasm very much, but I >> would appreciate it even more if this discussion would be done within the >> context of an issue. > > Michael, could you give a little protocol tutorial so we'd know what > to stick in Subject lines, what to stick in message bodies, where > threading matters or doesn't? > >> Tracker, this is ACTION-95 on Juan. > > For instance, did that link your message from an ACTION? Can we > instead say something like ISSUE-nn to associate a thread with an > issue? > > -- > -ericP
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 08:21:36 UTC