- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:41:07 -0500
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 1/19/2011 12:28 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > (deliberately breaking thread) > > * Michael Hausenblas<michael.hausenblas@deri.org> [2011-01-19 16:42+0000] >> >> With my chair hat on: I appreciate all your enthusiasm very much, but I >> would appreciate it even more if this discussion would be done within the >> context of an issue. > > Michael, could you give a little protocol tutorial so we'd know what > to stick in Subject lines, what to stick in message bodies, where > threading matters or doesn't? > >> Tracker, this is ACTION-95 on Juan. > > For instance, did that link your message from an ACTION? Can we > instead say something like ISSUE-nn to associate a thread with an > issue? Yes. In my experience, it's pretty easygoing - just mention ACTION-XX or ISSUE-YY in your email message and it should pick it up. Lee
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:41:44 UTC