Re: Minutes of the 2010-01-18 telcon for the RDF2RDF WG

> 
>    mhausenblas: questions for all the editors
>    ... I quite often go through the ML
> 
>    <mhausenblas>
> 
> [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Nov/0086.
>    html
> 
>    mhausenblas: here is a link to a discussion between ericP, betehess,
>    you...
>    ... regarding set vs multiset
>    ... I'm not that deep in what in means
>    ... but I'd like to understand if this needs an issue for that
> 
>    juansequeda: not sure if that need a issue
>    ... I'll look at that that
> 
>    <mhausenblas> [20]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/
> 
>    juansequeda: ok to check an action on this issue
> 
>    mhausenblas: ok to split in many issues
>    ... and one on the multiset issue
>    ... so we can speak about that next week
> 
>    betehess: please use the ML so we can help you :-)
>    ... especially because ericP and I initiated the thread

Juan, in order to help you with your action, I would like you to
considerer the following:

[[
CREATE TABLE Debts (
Name varchar(50),
Amount Integer
);
INSERT INTO Debts (Name, Amount) VALUES("juan", 50);
INSERT INTO Debts (Name, Amount) VALUES("juan", 50);
]]

Using this very simple RDB [1] example, can you go through all the
phases that lead to the RDF where I owe you 100?

Alexandre.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20101118/#Rel

Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 18:05:57 UTC