- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:56:32 -0500
- To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi all,
you can find the minutes at
http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
I cleaned them very quickly but could not remember who talked at some
point so I let the "@@". I would like to say two or three things to
improve the quality of the minutes:
1. even if you are not the scribe, you can fix the mistakes by using
that king of regex: s/this has to be replaced/was replaced by that/ .
2. as a scribe, you can rely on other, just insert something like
@@string@@ whenever you didn't get something very well
3. Zakim manages a queue, please add yourself using q+ and wait for the
chair to let you speak. That will help the scribe to understand who is
speaking :-)
Please find below the black-and-white version of the minutes.
Alexandre.
RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference
18 Jan 2011
See also: [2]IRC log
Attendees
Present
nyoung, +1.512.232.aaaa, juansequeda, +1.314.394.aabb, boris,
mhausenblas, +1.662.000.aacc, Alexandre, cygri, +25430004aadd,
soeren, nunolopes
Regrets
ericP, Ashok, Ivan, Herman, Marcelo, Souri, Seema, Harry
Chair
mhausenblas
Scribe
betehess
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]admin: Accept the minutes of last meeting
2. [5]Review of R2RML Test Cases
3. [6]R2RML status
4. [7]Direct Mapping status
5. [8]AOB
* [9]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 18 January 2011
<nyoung> I'm gonna hang up my phone and listen at David's desk
admin: Accept the minutes of last meeting
PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting
<boris> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: PROPOSAL accepted
<boris> [10]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91
<mhausenblas> ACTION-91?
<trackbot> ACTION-91 -- Michael Hausenblas to move accepted TC from
wiki to [11]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ -- due
2011-01-25 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91
Review of R2RML Test Cases
<boris>
[13]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1
boris, I just updated the wiki page
<boris>
[14]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1
<boris> [15]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests/
scribe: Eric, betehess and I set up a repository to store the files
related to the test cases
<mhausenblas> Michael: suggest to create a new page
[16]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestCases and have only
the
protocol there
mhausenblas: great job
... you might want to create a new page
<Zakim> betehess, you wanted to comment quickly on the repository
betehess: the repository is write-enabled for this WG
mhausenblas: boris, please describe the architecture
<mhausenblas> ACTION-81?
<trackbot> ACTION-81 -- Juan Sequeda to and Eric to draft Direct
Mapping TC -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [17]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/81
boris: 81 is still opened
R2RML status
mhausenblas, richard has 5 actions :-)
richard: no update for me
mhausenblas: any comment?
richard: I have a file ready to be turned of into issues
... will do whenever I have time
mhausenblas: any other comments?
dmcneil: I have an issue with escaping the { }
<mhausenblas>
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0019.
html
<nateyoung> that was David McNeil from Revelytix
dmcneil: the document has not addressed that at the moment
... we had a problem during the implementation
<nateyoung> he's on the phone, I'm on the IRC :)
Direct Mapping status
juansequeda: we should go back on track this week
... I believe that MacTed had to do a review
mhausenblas: he is not around
... but any progress?
juansequeda: hopefully next week
mhausenblas: questions for all the editors
... I quite often go through the ML
<mhausenblas>
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Nov/0086.
html
mhausenblas: here is a link to a discussion between ericP, betehess,
you...
... regarding set vs multiset
... I'm not that deep in what in means
... but I'd like to understand if this needs an issue for that
juansequeda: not sure if that need a issue
... I'll look at that that
<mhausenblas> [20]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/
juansequeda: ok to check an action on this issue
mhausenblas: ok to split in many issues
... and one on the multiset issue
... so we can speak about that next week
betehess: please use the ML so we can help you :-)
... especially because ericP and I initiated the thread
juansequeda: will do
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-X
mhausenblas: please remember to include the issue number in ML
threads
... actually whenever we talk about an issue, like IRC
... there might be another action item
<mhausenblas> ACTION-89?
<trackbot> ACTION-89 -- Michael Hausenblas to create a Linked Data
issue and draft proposal to address -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [21]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/89
mhausenblas: that was part of one of my actions
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-7?
<trackbot> ISSUE-7 -- Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF --
raised
<trackbot> [22]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7
mhausenblas: on ISSUE-7
<mhausenblas> [23]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues
mhausenblas: I would like to formally propose to open this issue
<mhausenblas> close ACTION-89
<trackbot> ACTION-89 Create a Linked Data issue and draft proposal to
address closed
mhausenblas: so the WG can acknoledge officially this issue
<mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: To accept the ISSUE-7
+1
<juansequeda> +1
<cygri> +1
mhausenblas: maybe someone want to take over?
RESOLUTION: the WG accepts the ISSUE-7
<mhausenblas>
[24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0030.
html
AOB
<mhausenblas> [25]http://www.example.com/r2rml?string=Paris
juansequeda: I would like to speak about hhalpin email
... we raised this topic a long time ago
... as the input will always a string
... how to deambiguite
... I'm curious to know what people think about it
... maybe a solution or an idea?
mhausenblas: if you have a string, you have to make sure that these
URIs match their expectation
@@: I believe it's another topic
scribe: out of the scope of this group
juansequeda: I agree
... "it's your problem"
mhausenblas: ok but how can we formalize that?
... as we have to come up with a solution easy enough
... like in term of expectations
... I don't know, but it's part of the challenge there
... it's in the charter
@@: maybe with user defined functions that output in RDF?
juansequeda: with the function call approach, you may have a problem
with the reverse function needed for SPARQL for example
... if you search about a specific URI
<mhausenblas> Michael: I'm happy to take an action on this to review
existing approaches incl. DBpedia and Uberblic lookup, Triplify way,
OKKAM, etc and report on the options via the Wiki
juansequeda: so it may need to work both ways
mhausenblas: it makes sense that I take an action on that
... and see what people out there actually do
<mhausenblas> ACTION: soeren to create Wiki page with options for
disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded
in [26]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - soeren
<mhausenblas> ACTION: Auer to create Wiki page with options for
disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded
in [27]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-94 - Create Wiki page with options for
disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [on Sören
Auer - due 2011-01-25].
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Auer to create Wiki page with options for
disambiguation
interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: soeren to create Wiki page with options for
disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded
in [29]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [30]scribe.perl version 1.135
([31]CVS log)
$Date: 2011/01/18 17:48:39 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-irc
3. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#agenda
4. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item01
5. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item02
6. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item03
7. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item04
8. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item05
9. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#ActionSummary
10. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91
11. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/
12. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91
13. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1
14. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1
15. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests/
16. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestCases
17. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/81
18.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0019.html
19.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Nov/0086.html
20. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/
21. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/89
22. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7
23. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues
24.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0030.html
25. http://www.example.com/r2rml?string=Paris
26. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01
27. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02
28. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02
29. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01
30. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
31. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 17:56:32 UTC