- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:56:32 -0500
- To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, you can find the minutes at http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html I cleaned them very quickly but could not remember who talked at some point so I let the "@@". I would like to say two or three things to improve the quality of the minutes: 1. even if you are not the scribe, you can fix the mistakes by using that king of regex: s/this has to be replaced/was replaced by that/ . 2. as a scribe, you can rely on other, just insert something like @@string@@ whenever you didn't get something very well 3. Zakim manages a queue, please add yourself using q+ and wait for the chair to let you speak. That will help the scribe to understand who is speaking :-) Please find below the black-and-white version of the minutes. Alexandre. RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference 18 Jan 2011 See also: [2]IRC log Attendees Present nyoung, +1.512.232.aaaa, juansequeda, +1.314.394.aabb, boris, mhausenblas, +1.662.000.aacc, Alexandre, cygri, +25430004aadd, soeren, nunolopes Regrets ericP, Ashok, Ivan, Herman, Marcelo, Souri, Seema, Harry Chair mhausenblas Scribe betehess Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]admin: Accept the minutes of last meeting 2. [5]Review of R2RML Test Cases 3. [6]R2RML status 4. [7]Direct Mapping status 5. [8]AOB * [9]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 18 January 2011 <nyoung> I'm gonna hang up my phone and listen at David's desk admin: Accept the minutes of last meeting PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting <boris> +1 +1 RESOLUTION: PROPOSAL accepted <boris> [10]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91 <mhausenblas> ACTION-91? <trackbot> ACTION-91 -- Michael Hausenblas to move accepted TC from wiki to [11]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN <trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91 Review of R2RML Test Cases <boris> [13]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1 boris, I just updated the wiki page <boris> [14]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1 <boris> [15]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests/ scribe: Eric, betehess and I set up a repository to store the files related to the test cases <mhausenblas> Michael: suggest to create a new page [16]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestCases and have only the protocol there mhausenblas: great job ... you might want to create a new page <Zakim> betehess, you wanted to comment quickly on the repository betehess: the repository is write-enabled for this WG mhausenblas: boris, please describe the architecture <mhausenblas> ACTION-81? <trackbot> ACTION-81 -- Juan Sequeda to and Eric to draft Direct Mapping TC -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN <trackbot> [17]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/81 boris: 81 is still opened R2RML status mhausenblas, richard has 5 actions :-) richard: no update for me mhausenblas: any comment? richard: I have a file ready to be turned of into issues ... will do whenever I have time mhausenblas: any other comments? dmcneil: I have an issue with escaping the { } <mhausenblas> [18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0019. html <nateyoung> that was David McNeil from Revelytix dmcneil: the document has not addressed that at the moment ... we had a problem during the implementation <nateyoung> he's on the phone, I'm on the IRC :) Direct Mapping status juansequeda: we should go back on track this week ... I believe that MacTed had to do a review mhausenblas: he is not around ... but any progress? juansequeda: hopefully next week mhausenblas: questions for all the editors ... I quite often go through the ML <mhausenblas> [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Nov/0086. html mhausenblas: here is a link to a discussion between ericP, betehess, you... ... regarding set vs multiset ... I'm not that deep in what in means ... but I'd like to understand if this needs an issue for that juansequeda: not sure if that need a issue ... I'll look at that that <mhausenblas> [20]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/ juansequeda: ok to check an action on this issue mhausenblas: ok to split in many issues ... and one on the multiset issue ... so we can speak about that next week betehess: please use the ML so we can help you :-) ... especially because ericP and I initiated the thread juansequeda: will do <mhausenblas> ISSUE-X mhausenblas: please remember to include the issue number in ML threads ... actually whenever we talk about an issue, like IRC ... there might be another action item <mhausenblas> ACTION-89? <trackbot> ACTION-89 -- Michael Hausenblas to create a Linked Data issue and draft proposal to address -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN <trackbot> [21]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/89 mhausenblas: that was part of one of my actions <mhausenblas> ISSUE-7? <trackbot> ISSUE-7 -- Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF -- raised <trackbot> [22]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7 mhausenblas: on ISSUE-7 <mhausenblas> [23]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues mhausenblas: I would like to formally propose to open this issue <mhausenblas> close ACTION-89 <trackbot> ACTION-89 Create a Linked Data issue and draft proposal to address closed mhausenblas: so the WG can acknoledge officially this issue <mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: To accept the ISSUE-7 +1 <juansequeda> +1 <cygri> +1 mhausenblas: maybe someone want to take over? RESOLUTION: the WG accepts the ISSUE-7 <mhausenblas> [24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0030. html AOB <mhausenblas> [25]http://www.example.com/r2rml?string=Paris juansequeda: I would like to speak about hhalpin email ... we raised this topic a long time ago ... as the input will always a string ... how to deambiguite ... I'm curious to know what people think about it ... maybe a solution or an idea? mhausenblas: if you have a string, you have to make sure that these URIs match their expectation @@: I believe it's another topic scribe: out of the scope of this group juansequeda: I agree ... "it's your problem" mhausenblas: ok but how can we formalize that? ... as we have to come up with a solution easy enough ... like in term of expectations ... I don't know, but it's part of the challenge there ... it's in the charter @@: maybe with user defined functions that output in RDF? juansequeda: with the function call approach, you may have a problem with the reverse function needed for SPARQL for example ... if you search about a specific URI <mhausenblas> Michael: I'm happy to take an action on this to review existing approaches incl. DBpedia and Uberblic lookup, Triplify way, OKKAM, etc and report on the options via the Wiki juansequeda: so it may need to work both ways mhausenblas: it makes sense that I take an action on that ... and see what people out there actually do <mhausenblas> ACTION: soeren to create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded in [26]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - soeren <mhausenblas> ACTION: Auer to create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded in [27]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-94 - Create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [on Sören Auer - due 2011-01-25]. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Auer to create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded in [28]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: soeren to create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded in [29]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [30]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([31]CVS log) $Date: 2011/01/18 17:48:39 $ References 1. http://www.w3.org/ 2. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-irc 3. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#agenda 4. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item01 5. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item02 6. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item03 7. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item04 8. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item05 9. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#ActionSummary 10. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91 11. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ 12. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91 13. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1 14. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1 15. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests/ 16. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestCases 17. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/81 18. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0019.html 19. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Nov/0086.html 20. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/ 21. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/89 22. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7 23. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues 24. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0030.html 25. http://www.example.com/r2rml?string=Paris 26. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01 27. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02 28. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02 29. http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01 30. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm 31. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 17:56:32 UTC