- From: RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:09:44 +0000
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-5 (ddmapping): Default vs. direct mapping [R2RML] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/5 Raised by: Michael Hausenblas On product: R2RML There is an initial proposal for a direct graph [1] and a recent discussion on using default mapping [2]. The WG has to clarify, based on the input of the RDB2RDF Semantics Task Force, the usage in all documents (both, one, etc.). The R2RML doc [3] should reference the definition of a direct graph/default mapping. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Oct/0083.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 17:09:45 UTC