Re: R2RML practicability concerns

On 06.10.2010 9:12, Harry Halpin wrote:
> Since I imagine the editors are quite busy, would it be possible  that
> Soeren and the default mapping people combine forces with them to see what
> sensible default mapping can be done and write the details of how that
> would look like in the R2RML draft?

Good point. I'm very busy next days, so I'm not sure I will be able to 
write something up till next weeks call, but will try. (If anybody else 
wants to go ahead I'm very happy to join.)



Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 07:49:32 UTC