Re: R2RML practicability concerns

On 06.10.2010 9:12, Harry Halpin wrote:
> Since I imagine the editors are quite busy, would it be possible  that
> Soeren and the default mapping people combine forces with them to see what
> sensible default mapping can be done and write the details of how that
> would look like in the R2RML draft?

Good point. I'm very busy next days, so I'm not sure I will be able to 
write something up till next weeks call, but will try. (If anybody else 
wants to go ahead I'm very happy to join.)

Best,

Sören

Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 07:49:32 UTC