Re: Schedule [was Re: Start discussion]

Harry,

Good to know. My bad then, I should of looked at that page

Maybe we are getting ahead of ourselves with thr discussion going on  
in the other thread, nevertheless it is very interesting and I'm glad  
it is going

Juan Sequeda
www.juansequeda.com

On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:05 PM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> There has been no discussion at all on the list, and that honestly  
>> worries
>> me.
>>
>> I know that we need to have a Use Case documents, but it is not  
>> completely
>> clear to me what else we need to turn in and by when.
>>
>
> Just to be clear, the schedule in its most updated form is always on  
> the
> WG's home-page. I will keep it updated. The schedule is here [1]. In
> essence, here's the requirements and due dates:
>
> 1) End of April - publish use-cases
> 2) End of June - publish a working draft of rdb2rdf language
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/#timeline
>
>
>> One issue that I personally feel than needs to be settled is the  
>> semantics
>> of the language. One we have this defined, it is just a matter of  
>> deciding
>> on what is the syntax. I don't think we have made much progress on  
>> this
>> issue. I have proposed to develop the semantics of the mapping  
>> language in
>> datalog. I'd be up for working on this in conjunction with Marcelo  
>> Arenas
>> and Dan Miranker.
>>
>
> To be clear, I do not want to vary too much from the quite good plan  
> the
> WG has.
>
> I agree determining the semantics is very important, and I believe  
> we have
> some good people here on the team. Once we have a good draft, we can
> figure out the semantics. I am sure we can map SPARQL->SQL semantics  
> and
> vice versa if this is what is needed, and that plus a trivial mapping
> language in XML fulfills the charter.
>
>>
>> What else should we be having discussions on? The clock is ticking.
>>
>>
>> Juan Sequeda
>> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
>> www.juansequeda.com
>>
>

Received on Monday, 22 March 2010 22:15:39 UTC