Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF

> I am truly confused right now.

Yeah, confusing, isn't it?

Again, as I said, we're operating on a moving target here. Don't worry, bits
are integrated as we talk. We take as an input all the relevant Wiki pages
and create a consistent, balanced document.

I've printed out all the documents now and currently comparing everything.

If you want to contribute, I'd like to ask you to rewrite [1] so that we can
include it. In its current form I can't understand it, it doesn't fit really
in and is IMHO also not really in scope of this document.

Happy to continue the discussion during the telecon.

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements#R2ML_Appli
cation_Use_Case_Requirements

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:38:37 -0500
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to
> RDF
> 
> Michael,
> 
> What is in [1] is not what is in [2]. I'm confused? What is in [1] is
> essentially everything that we had originally in the use case wiki page,
> which I then moved to [3]
> 
> I thought that the idea of Dan and I working [2] was to start organizing the
> final document, because what is in [1] is just two much.  Through all the
> discussion, we have determined that some of the use cases in [1] are more of
> case studies and not actual use cases. In [2] we are telling a small story
> where non-tech people can understand.
> 
> I am truly confused right now.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Draft_of_Use_Cases
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements>
> Juan Sequeda
> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
> www.juansequeda.com
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Michael Hausenblas <
> michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> As a preparation for today's telecon I'd like to point out that the current
>> version of the Editor's Draft for our UC document is available at [1].
>> 
>> Due to the events in the last couple of days, we (Eric and I) are operating
>> on a moving target, so please be kind with us, we try our best to
>> accommodate with all the brilliant contributions made, no matter how late
>> they came in ;)
>> 
>> Although the content of [1] is still changing (though the raw bits are
>> there; the structure has stabilised), I'd like to encourage you to print it
>> out and read it. Now.
>> 
>> Please bear in mind the intended audience, any implicit assumptions one
>> might have (esp. as you should consider yourself an expert in this area,
>> where maybe 90% of the the readers are not) and that we are writing on a
>> W3C
>> document, not an academic article.
>> 
>> That said - enjoy the first Editor's Draft and looking forward to a good
>> discussion re its content and future development in roughly an hour and a
>> half.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>      Michael
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
>> 
>> --
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>

Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 14:46:40 UTC