- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:44:11 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=30039
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
I should perhaps correct the paragraph above that reads:
So in the component model, Ht has {prohibited substitutions} = (extension), and
in consequence HtE is not *validly derived* from Ht.
to read:
So in the component model, Ht has {prohibited substitutions} = (extension), and
in consequence HtE is not *validly derived* from Ht *given K=(extension)*.
It is however validly derived given K=() (the empty set), and the XSD 1.0 rule
(Rule 4 of Element Declaration Properties Correct) in fact invokes it with
K=().
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 17:44:17 UTC