- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:57:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29929 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Digging deeper into my memory of this, I think we were particularly concerned that an implementation that evaluated all the input maps in parallel should not be required to retain information about the ordering of the input maps purely in order to decide which duplicate to retain, when the user might not care. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 08:57:48 UTC