- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:24:48 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29929 --- Comment #3 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> --- Thanks for the clarification, Michael. Just a guess: It could be helpful for the user of this function to name the value "ignore" (or "use-any"? "use-one"? because "unspecified" hides the fact that only one value will be retained), and to add a little note that this option may improve parallelized execution in some implementations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2016 11:24:55 UTC