- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:08:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29893 --- Comment #4 from Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> --- > I can't see any particular reason why the XQueryX 3.1 security > considerations appendix shouldn't be word-for-word identical with > that for XQuery 31. Yes, thanks. It looks like this was the intent but the XQueryX version has lagged behind. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 15:08:12 UTC