- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 08:46:01 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29628
Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
--- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
While I am not unsympathetic towards the proposed change, the original function
shows the recursive nature and is a common way in functional languages to
describe such higher order functions, this can be seen in many text books.
Furthermore, I think it is good to show the tail-recursion, which is not
present in the map operator (though it begs the question, is the current
signature truly tail-recursive? I don't think so, as there is an embedded
function call in the final fn:for-each call, a let-return statement would
perhaps be better).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 08:46:10 UTC