- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:08:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29628 Bug ID: 29628 Summary: 16.2.1 fn:for-each - proposal of more succinct rules Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Functions and Operators 3.1 Assignee: mike@saxonica.com Reporter: hrennau@yahoo.de QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- Would it not be simpler, clearer and more intuitive if the equivalent implementation were defined using the simple map operator: declare function fn:for-each($seq, $f) {$seq ! $f(.)}; instead of: declare function fn:for-each($seq, $f) { if (fn:empty($seq)) then () else ($f(fn:head($seq)), fn:for-each(fn:tail($seq), $f)) }; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 15 May 2016 19:08:57 UTC