- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:51:35 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29723 --- Comment #6 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- Sorry, I think this is better (ignore comment 5), and better complements the existing wording: unspecified If duplicate keys are present, all but one of a set of duplicates are ignored, where it is implementation-defined which item from the set is chosen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 13:51:48 UTC