- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:47:36 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29723 --- Comment #5 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- To make that concrete, I'd propose a text like this: unspecified If duplicate keys are present, the chosen value is implementation-defined; the implementation may choose the "use-first" or "use-last" strategy for handling duplicates, or may choose some other strategy. The implementation may not combine or raise an error on duplicates if this option is chosen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 13:47:47 UTC