- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:30:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29355
Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
--- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
> $sequence[-1] to get the last value
This would introduce a backwards-compatibility issue. It is currently legal
syntax and code and examples exists that exploit the fact that zero and
negative values return the empty sequence.
> Then you can at least do $sequence[2 to 4]
This I'd like, but I believe with XPath 2.0 there was a strong reason to
disallow sequences of more-than-one in predicates (FORG0006, EBV not defined
for sequences > 1).
Note: you can already do the following, which gives what you want and is
shorter than your alternative syntax:
$sequence[position() = 2 to 4]
> $sequence[2 to 10 by 3]
This would change the RangeExpr production (or, as you suggest as operator, the
infix operator productions). If it doesn't cause any EBNF conflicts (and the WG
agrees) this is viable, I think. I agree that it adds clarity to a certain
class of use-cases.
Given the previous rewrite, this can be rewritten as:
$sequence[position() = (2 to 10)[position() mod 3 = 1]]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2016 15:30:30 UTC