- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 02:04:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28589 --- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- The section on width mentions for max-width the special cases, like Nn and the year component. Other cases are not considered special, as long as the value is not changed by that truncation. For min-width, there is a special case, and that's probably why it was included in the section on min-width. I think it makes sense that if min-width applies, that max-width applies as well. But then there is still room for license, because the text allows Tues and Fri, it seems reasonable that both "GMT-05" and "GMT-5" are legal with width 2-6 and 2-5 (but not with 6-6). Or should the widest unpadded value be taken that is allowed by the width-modifier? We could add a rule that says that when the TZ component is requested, that the TZ name, if required, may not be omitted beyond its shortest requested form, i.e., CT, CLT, CLST all denote Chile Standard Time, UTC+04:00. I doubt anyone would want that kind of expressive freedom though. For me, simply truncating as the text appears to allow, seems more than enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 02:04:56 UTC