- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:34:09 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28915
Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |josh.spiegel@oracle.com
--- Comment #1 from Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> ---
I agree. I don't think XQuery/XPath should be using "generalized atomic type"
to define constructor functions. (see bug 17226)
There are two more references in appendix C:
"functions in fn namespace, and constructors for built-in generalized atomic
types"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2015 15:34:12 UTC