- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:47:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17226
Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
CC| |josh.spiegel@oracle.com
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #4 from Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> ---
Can you clarify why a constructor function is expected for s:lowercaseName?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-30/#id-constructor-functions
"For every generalized atomic type in the in-scope schema types (except
xs:NOTATION and xs:anyAtomicType, which are not instantiable), a constructor
function is implicitly defined."
[Definition: A generalized atomic type is a type which is either (a) an atomic
type or (b) a pure union type ].
[Definition: A pure union type is an XML Schema union type that satisfies the
following constraints: (1) {variety} is union, (2) the {facets} property is
empty, .....
s:lowercaseName has facets so it isn't a pure union type or a generalized
atomic type. The test description is "Constructor function for union type with
facets".
Am I missing something?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2015 11:47:43 UTC