- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:22:16 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28494
--- Comment #6 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---
Dangerous perhaps, but legitimate.
If the unfortunate user assumes that
let $x as empty-sequence() := local:return(1)
return $x
will always test the assertion, they'll probably assume that
empty (let $x as empty-sequence() := local:return(1)
return $x)
will fail rather that returning an error.
or
1 + (let $x as empty-sequence() := local:return(1) return $x)
will fail rather that returning the empty sequence.
The specification should come with a warning saying that "as empty-sequence()"
is probably a bad thing to use.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 12:22:18 UTC