- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:31:39 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28486
Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tim@cbcl.co.uk
--- Comment #5 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---
> So it's unclear how expanded QNames are actually written in the declare
> output declaration. There needs to be a statement that a QName can be
> written as an EQName; there should also be a statement about the default
> namespace that is used when a name is written as a simple NCName (it should
> be the default namespace for elements and types).
Our implementation does NOT use the default element/type namespace for
declare option output:method
declare option output:cdata-section-elements
declare option output:suppress-indentation
and so we think that your assertion "it should be the default namespace for
elements and types" is up for debate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 13:31:44 UTC