W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2015

[Bug 28486] [XQ 3.1] Lexical form of serialization parameters

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:31:39 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-28486-523-ntZ3CeosXW@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |tim@cbcl.co.uk

--- Comment #5 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---

> So it's unclear how expanded QNames are actually written in the declare
> output declaration.  There needs to be a statement that a QName can be
> written as an EQName; there should also be a statement about the default
> namespace that is used when a name is written as a simple NCName (it should
> be the default namespace for elements and types).

Our implementation does NOT use the default element/type namespace for

        declare option output:method
        declare option output:cdata-section-elements
        declare option output:suppress-indentation

and so we think that your assertion "it should be the default namespace for
elements and types" is up for debate.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 13:31:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:53 UTC