[Bug 28486] [XQ 3.1] Lexical form of serialization parameters


Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |tim@cbcl.co.uk

--- Comment #5 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---

> So it's unclear how expanded QNames are actually written in the declare
> output declaration.  There needs to be a statement that a QName can be
> written as an EQName; there should also be a statement about the default
> namespace that is used when a name is written as a simple NCName (it should
> be the default namespace for elements and types).

Our implementation does NOT use the default element/type namespace for

        declare option output:method
        declare option output:cdata-section-elements
        declare option output:suppress-indentation

and so we think that your assertion "it should be the default namespace for
elements and types" is up for debate.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 13:31:44 UTC