- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 22:24:12 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27736
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
The WG decided today that it was not prepared to spend WG time maintaining or
adjudicating XQuery 1.0 tests. The tests are there as a resource for people who
want to use them, and members of the WG may debate them and improve them if
they wish, but it is not an activity that the WG as a group will track.
I'm herefore going to close this as WON'T FIX.
Personal observation on this particular test: XQuery 1.0 is underspecified in
this area; this was remedied in XQuery 3.0. The WG clearly indicated in XQ 3.0
how it felt this situation ought to be handled; for anyone still developing or
testing an XQ 1.0 processor you can take this as evidence of the WG's intent,
but ultimately if the published XQ 1.0 spec doesn't tell you the answer, it's
up to you what you do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 22:24:14 UTC