- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 06:18:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25919 --- Comment #10 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> --- Agreed. So I'd therefore now agree that XPST0001 shouldn't be permitted in any of these tests (including old fn-doc ones) and would like to see the error case be explicitly mentioned in the relevant functions (rolled Into existing codes). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 31 May 2014 06:18:22 UTC