- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:36:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21963 --- Comment #6 from Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> --- Hi, I agree with Jonathan's assessment. I think that resilience in case of heterogeneity in the input sequence is important (i.e., return an empty sequence rather than raise an error), and follows the XPath paradigm as well. I also think that consistency between function calls and the ? syntax would be nice. This is of course the view from a database/document-store perspective. I am afraid that this is another example where the use case scenario affects the design decision: if we reason data-oriented (NoSQL), then iterating makes sense (even with functions in the data). If we reason pure map-oriented (i.e., equivalent of objects as Mike mentions), then raising an error makes sense. I hope it helps. Kind regards, Ghislain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2014 09:36:53 UTC