- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:07:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24496 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I've looked at this and I don't think it's worth the effort of complicating the rules for this case. I just can't see a practical use case where the user would want to write a motionless try expression, with a consuming catch expression. I propose closing as WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 17:07:53 UTC