- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:44:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24496 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com --- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> --- We discussed this in Prague. There was some skepticism about using catch clauses for normal, rather than exceptional, processing. But on balance we decided that it would be more consistent with our practice elsewhere to make the catch elements a choice operand group, and to allow the choice operand group to consume input if the try does not. If we're going to allow it, we can refer to the general streamability rules, rather than by spelling the rules out in detail as in the bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 13:45:00 UTC