- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:58:09 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24537
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
It's intended to mean
if (every operand O satisfies (O is crawling or O is striding))
I think a different reading would be hard to justify, and I guess the example
was added just in case there was any doubt. It's a bit difficult to find a more
rigorous wording that isn't turgid to read, but I'll go with
if the first operand is striding or crawling and the second operand is also
striding or crawling, then...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 17:58:10 UTC