[Bug 24537] Ambiguous rule #4 in union, intersect, except expressions streamability


Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
It's intended to mean 

if (every operand O satisfies (O is crawling or O is striding))

I think a different reading would be hard to justify, and I guess the example
was added just in case there was any doubt. It's a bit difficult to find a more
rigorous wording that isn't turgid to read, but I'll go with

if the first operand is striding or crawling and the second operand is also
striding or crawling, then...

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 17:58:10 UTC