- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 19:36:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21868 --- Comment #2 from Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Probably the approach to take is to have two variants of the test case: > > *one where where we add the dependency expecting the support of > serialization parameters, i.e. satisfied=true. > > * The other where were the dependency on the serialization parameters is not > available, i.e. satisfied=false > > If you agree, I will make the change. Agree but first I think one has to create a new dependency in FOTS for the serialization parameters specified in prolog, right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 19:37:00 UTC